Brand Perspective: In Re Ed Hardy

Ed Hardy Store by Dickies Europe.

“The marketing is more important than the product.  People are followers.  They want to be attributed to a certain style.  Is not me making the rules, is reality.  Is the reality.” -Christian Audigier

This is part one of a series on perspective.

GQ arrives.

The latest issue of GQ magazine arrived yesterday.  While browsing I came across a profile article on Christian Audigier, the French designer responsible Von Dutch (website disabled, oops!) trucker hats and club and UFC favorite, Ed Hardy.

According to the running list on, “Hating People Who Wear Ed Hardy” ranked 124th.  A thorough 20 minute search of the Internets yielded no other official tally’s, but I assume there is as proportional level of animosity towards the brand across races, as there is diversity in my experience, amongst its wearers.

Back to the article.

Mr. Audigier came across like everything I’d expect the designer of high-priced, rhinestone studded skull and crossbones, and tigers (for starters) adorned t-shirts, to be.  He is unapologetic about the image his the brand promotes.  He revels in the fact that it all but ensures an Ed Hardy customer will not get into certain clubs (at least in L.A).  Like designers before him, Ed Hardy is more than just a brand, it’s a lifestyle.

And while some look down on Ed Hardy and related brands like Affliction, writing them off as attire of the tool inclined, both intentionally or not have developed strong brand culture, and in the case of Ed Hardy the backing of the Iconix Brand Group, owners of Jay-Z’s Rocawear brand, which invested $17 million for a 50% stake in the brand in May 2009.

Brand Perspective

My original interest in Ed Hardy on a substantive level stemmed from a discussion with a friend on how, with all the supposedly déclassé (from the GQ article) associations Ed Hardy appeared to have, was the brand continuing to be worn by a fair amount of party goers (at least down on 6th Street in Austin) and celebrities.  The answer is simple.  People LIKE being associated with that brand.  They like images of flash and excess.  It’s no different from minimalist purchasers of American Apparel.

Both are buying not just clothes but the identity that particular brand carries with it whether consciously or not.  While the clothes don’t make the person, what you wear certainly does go into your personal brand.

The Take Away.

Say what you want about Mr. Audigier and Ed Hardy, but he knows how to market his brand and turn that dollar.  And I’ll admit, I’ve contemplated adding an Ed Hardy shirt (just the a shirt) to my wardrobe from time to time.


Photo by Dickies Europe


3 Comments on “Brand Perspective: In Re Ed Hardy”

  1. Haha good read dude. But let me stop you right there at contemplation. While I think that Ed Hardy clothes are hideous, it is not the fashion faux pas that makes the brand unattractive, but rather the 95% of the clientele who have turned an otherwise mediocre fashion statement into this symbol of aggression, hostility, and classlessness. You don’t want to go there, AJ.

  2. Jennifer Burnett says:

    In the Man of Exception article “How Not to Be a Douche,” Ed Hardy clothing is deemed “the magical cape of the douche species.”

    See also (Ed Hardy — uniform of the douche); (over-priced clothes for douchebags and desperate cougars).

    Bottom line: just say no.

  3. A.J. says:


    Quoting from “if someone is wearing Ed Hardy clothing, they want you to know loud and clear that they are wearing Ed Hardy clothing.” That essentially is my point.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s